I was a graduate comparative lit student in the 1980s when Theory reigned. My understanding is that Theory taught that all interpretations are equally valid, and that interpreting literature is the creative equal of actually writing poems, stories, novels and plays.
The quote restates the nature vs. nurture debate. Evidence in a variety of disciplines points to the equal influence of environment and inherited traits. Refusal to acknowledge the role of inherited traits characterizes second wave feminists as opposed to third wave feminists who are more science friendly (and more sex-positive).
The part I found particularly interesting is the assertion that the balance between the nature-advocates and the nurture-advocates is different in academia and the general culture. I myself found Pinker's "Blank Slate" to be good (YMMV, of course), but was somewhat puzzled over his report of the intensity of the opposition. But of course, Pinker is an academic, and it seems possible that the intellectual mileau he has been "fighting" in is far different from the real world.
interpreting literature is the creative equal of actually writing
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 08:37 pm (UTC)The quote restates the nature vs. nurture debate. Evidence in a variety of disciplines points to the equal influence of environment and inherited traits. Refusal to acknowledge the role of inherited traits characterizes second wave feminists as opposed to third wave feminists who are more science friendly (and more sex-positive).
no subject
Date: 2009-05-28 02:04 am (UTC)interpreting literature is the creative equal of actually writing
Ugh.