Date: 2009-03-04 02:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luckycee.livejournal.com
I prefer your parents' explanation. But I'll bet the stories are pretty good, like the Bal Shem Tov stories.

Date: 2009-03-05 01:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidfcooper.livejournal.com
My parents' explanation makes the most sense to me. Some of the stories probably are pretty good, but others may be sex-phobic such as the ones in which people hang by their body parts.

Date: 2009-03-04 02:40 am (UTC)
richardf8: (Default)
From: [personal profile] richardf8
Is Jewish Views of the Afterlife his book?

Do you have contact info for him?

Would he be a suitable scholar for a reform community?

Date: 2009-03-05 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidfcooper.livejournal.com
Yes, Simcha Raphael (http://www.simcharaphael.com/index.html) is the author of Jewish Views of the Afterlife (http://www.simcharaphael.com/soam-jva1.html). Click on "Contact Info" on his website. He is associated with the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College. He might be a suitable guest scholar for a Reform community if that community is more Jewish renewal than say, classical Reform.

Date: 2009-03-05 02:56 am (UTC)
richardf8: (Default)
From: [personal profile] richardf8
Thanks. I might pick up the book to review. Our adult ed. committee has a Donor who wants to do a Death/Afterlife scholar. She originally wanted Dovber Pinson for the lecturer, but after reading his book, I concluded that he was too attached to the Kabbalistic view of the afterlife, and only one Kabbalistic view of the afterlife. And Major Flake-O. Right now, I'm looking at Daniel Syme and Rifat Sonsino's What Happens after I Die?, and it seems very . . . Academic.

My congregation has streaks of classical Reform, Contemporary Reform, and Renewal running through it. At first glance, his book looks like a good middle ground between Flake-O and Scholarly.

Date: 2009-03-05 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidfcooper.livejournal.com
Glad I could help.

Date: 2009-03-04 04:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jonchiz67.livejournal.com
Good article. Interesting. Thanks.

I think you implied, although didn't state directly, that contemporary Jews aren't supposed to take these ideas literally. Is that correct? Or does it vary depending on which branch of Judaism?

Date: 2009-03-05 01:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidfcooper.livejournal.com
We're all free to chose to believe or not believe what ever makes sense to us. A story doesn't have to be true to be meaningful. But those who do take these ideas literally tend to be Haredi. Norman Lamm's statement is typical of Modern Orthodoxy and those non-Orthodox who believe in an afterlife but not in any specific details.

Profile

davidfcooper: (Default)
davidfcooper

January 2022

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 03:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios